Was this review helpful to you? The Council of Ministers: As he says in his essay on dialectical montage, one of his aims was the. The people surround the statue and a peasant woman climbs onto its base to harangue the crowd. There is nothing mystical or sacred about the throne. The dialectic within this shot connects to the movement within the sequence—the machine gunner versus the fleeing crowd; within the Act—the Provisional Government versus the people; and finally, within the film—oppression versus revolution. Here I will try to understand his use of dialectical materialism and to evaluate whether and how he translated it into cinema.
For this reason, he needed to find and depict the dialectic of these events. The massiveness of the red guard buildup, its size and organization, which does not balance with what we have seen of the Provisional Government defenders, convinces the viewer of its inexorability. Battleship Potemkin absolutely changed my overall outlook on cinema, blowing my mind to pieces with the style and the way it was edited. Instead of contending and struggling with the antithesis, the thesis simply overwhelms it. In the entrance corridor stands a huge sword—the Bolsheviks are about to seize power. Here Eisenstein solves the problem with a more integrated technique.
Montage of machine gun barrels—the dispersing crowd—the firing guns—the srrgei crowd—banners fall. He began each act with ssergei thesis, set up its antithesis, and at the end of the act, resolved the conflict with a synthesis which became, at the opening of the next act, the new thesis. Shots of the army and the peasants, then, finally, with a tremendous heave, the statue falls forward. A sailor opens a trunk and finds hundreds of mint-new St.
This article is about the film. In the peaceful countryside, Vassily opposes the rich kulaks over the coming of collective farming.
And the next two shots read: A Bolshevik soldier joins the dance. This soundtrack is the one used on most DVD releases of the film. Cinematically this is just as much of a masterpiece as any other Eisenstein.
One tries to tear it with her teeth, another lifts her skirt to try to stomp its pole. A white carriage horse hangs from the opening bridge.
The women are unable to destroy the flag; they cannot destroy even the symbol of Bolshevik power, never mind the real thing. The Provisional Government drafts an appeal to the citizens attempting to reassert its legitimacy, but that evening a congress is held including delegates from all parts of the country and the Soviets are voted into power. The camera focuses on the cross at the end of the hallway.
The red guards flood the hail and swallow the cadets. They bayonet the thick mattresses we remember the straw mats for the Bolsheviks in prisonand they create a great storm of stuffing and feathers.
Antonov leads the rush down the hallway. The Tartars, through their national dances, are celebrating the revolution. Yet he wanted to portray the revolution visually. Sergei Eisenstein, in the first decade of the Soviet Union and his own first decade in the cinema, was deeply committed to Marxism.
Octpber imperial eagle wobbles, sergdi the sailor opens the gates to the revolution. Used one way it could be referring…never mind, you get it. Two Kronstadt sailors appear, chase the thieves out, and take axes to the bottles. A Bolshevik banner unfurls. Instead, the director plans a pageant. But Eisenstein so stacks his portrayal in favor of the Bolsheviks that once again as he himself later admitted he undercuts his drama Film Form, 38 and In this case, too, a chain of images attempted to achieve a purely intellectual resolution, resulting from a conflict between a preconception and a gradual discrediting of it in purposeful steps Film Form Or, at least, that’s how the film would definitely lead things onto.
A shot of a church incense burner. The purpose of this essay, therefore, is not to add to the existing criticism on Eisenstein but to shift the discussion, to consider him in terms of his Marxism. Thus, they think that by destroying the flag, they can obliterate the Bolsheviks.
October (Ten Days that Shook the World) () – IMDb
In the montage fusion, the soldier becomes his machine, he is reified into a brutal, dehumanized object. I have read all about how Sergei Eisenstein is supposed to be one of eisebstein great theorists and directors of the silent film era but I had never actually seen one of his films before.
He slides open a hidden panel in the chess board and pulls out a small jeweled crown. Eisenstein just keeps impressing me. Instead of Kerensky, the embodiment of the Provisional Government, moving toward a final collision with the Bolsheviks and the proletariat, he is fleeing.
Cut to the young oxtober asleep on the throne: Synopsus reality, it was a chaotic and weirdly anticlimactic affair involving far fewer people. Related News Culture Warrior: Eisenstein wants his audience to come to this same critical awareness about the old order, the church, and the war.
October (Ten Days that Shook the World)
Connections Featured in The Cutting Edge: Bolshevik tracts and newspapers are carted out. Comedy on the Eisenatein Eyepoppers Fantastic Reality. The scene of the storming was based more on The Storming of the Winter Palace froma re-enactment involving Vladimir Lenin and thousands of Red Guardswitnessed byspectators, than the original occasion, which was far less photogenic.